RoboTwin 2.0
50 bimanual tasks93.70%
+1.85 percentage points over Fast-WAM
Average success rate (%) · axis starts at 90
1 CoCoMatrix2 Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences3 Tsinghua University4 Fudan University5 University of California, San Diego
† Corresponding authors
TL;DR
HiLo-WAM decouples long-horizon task evolution from local visual dynamics. A sparse stream provides historical context and coarse future evolution; a dense stream captures fine-grained robot–object interactions. Together, they guide action generation; progressive inference reduces redundant computation.
World Action Models (WAMs) improve robotic manipulation by jointly modeling visual dynamics and robot actions. However, most existing WAMs model dense short-horizon visual dynamics, capturing local interactions but providing limited long-range task context. Extending prediction horizons increases uncertainty and computation while entangling task-level evolution with fine-grained local dynamics, obscuring their dependencies and distinct roles in action generation. We propose HiLo-WAM, which decouples long-horizon task evolution from local visual dynamics while jointly modeling their interaction with robot actions. A sparse long-horizon visual stream captures historical task context and future evolution, while a dense local dynamics visual stream models short-horizon robot–object interactions. The two streams operate at different temporal scales within a unified dual-DiT architecture and guide actions through structured cross-stream attention. Progressive inference further reduces unnecessary computation through stream-wise partial denoising, joint denoising, and dynamic skipping. Experiments demonstrate strong long-horizon manipulation performance: HiLo-WAM achieves a 93.70% average success rate on RoboTwin 2.0 and a 17.43 progress score on RoboDojo long-horizon tasks, with robust in-domain and OOD performance on the Fourier GR-3 robot. Ablations confirm the complementary contributions of long-horizon task evolution and local interaction dynamics, while temporal-scale analyses highlight the importance of balancing temporal coverage and resolution. Progressive inference further achieves a 2.93× speedup while improving performance.
Method
Sample one video at two temporal scales, then jointly refine visual predictions and actions.
Swipe diagram ↔
Visual streams stop and cache before action denoising finishes.
nH ≤ nL ≤ nA01 / Overall results
Best RoboTwin success and RoboDojo progress among the compared methods.
93.70%
+1.85 percentage points over Fast-WAM
Average success rate (%) · axis starts at 90
17.43 progress
+8.29 progress points over Fast-WAM
Full-task success: 6.50% (tied highest).
02 / Ablation studies
| Direct history¹ | Future evolution | Local dynamics | Avg. SR ↑ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90.58 | |||
| 93.22 | |||
| 93.52 | |||
| 93.70 |
¹ Masked direct history still conditions the long-horizon stream’s future prediction.
Full model over local dynamics alone
90.58% → 93.70%03 / Temporal scale
04 / Inference efficiency
380.02 ms
Per action chunk
93.54% → 93.70%RoboTwin success
Action-chunk latency · Lower is better
Test setup. RoboTwin 2.0 · single NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 GPU.
Timing scope. Steady-state, end-to-end latency per action-chunk inference call, mainly covering Video VAE processing, Video DiT denoising, and Action DiT denoising.
Prompt embeddings are computed once at startup and cached. Speedup is relative to HiLo-WAM’s sequential baseline.
Real-robot demos
Three long-horizon bimanual tasks on Fourier GR-3, requiring consistent progress across multiple assembly or disassembly steps.
Higher average progress and success under scene shifts.
Mean over three tasks · 10 trials per task. OOD: lighting, background, and clutter shifts.